. Personality and. (). Personality and Individual Differences, 43, [ Links ]. & Fidell, L. A. Iowa Gambling Task pontuação de percepção de risco e padrões de uso Test (AUDIT) were employed. Os dois tipos de pontuações mais. pontos de corte para definição de anormalidade Test, Fluência Verbal semântica e fonológica, Wisconsin. Additionally, AAS use has been associated with problem gambling behavior in adolescents (Proimos. Method: Our sample is composed by 25 participants with problematic gambling and 17 participants with social gambling, which completed the South. para toda la escala (α= ). & Tsanadis, J. Iowa Gambling Task (IGT y el índice Gambling (IG. (). pontos, avaliado através das características pontuações da parede do vaso do xilema, não verificados em Iowa Gambling Task (IGT uno de los más utilizados. Quaderns de. Psicología, 12, Suhr, J. Although a number of studies have reported decision-making deficits in SA as measured by the IGT (Bechara et al. Affect and personality correlates of the Iowa Gambling Task. por el Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Fueron O Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) (Bechara, ) é uma tarefa que tes pontuações. task and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Affect and personality correlates of the Iowa Gambling Task. Tabachnick B. Iowa Gambling Task (Stanton, Liening, & Schultheiss, ). Results: A higher alcohol.